Interesting Topics
Brunei:
Fifth National Development Plan 1986-1990
Malaysia:
Laws of Malaysia. Act 308. Child Care Center Act 1984: Prosecution of Offenses
Malaysia:
Surat Pekeliling Pentadbiran No. 3/67: Staff entitlement ratios
Philippines:
Prescribing Guidelines for Conducting the Flag Ceremony
Philippines:
Increasing Participation in Programs for the Gifted and Talented
Philippines:
Accountability on the Use of Teaching Aids/ Equipment
Singapore:
Upgrading Teacher Training
Singapore:
Pre-university Scholarships for the Study of the Humanities
Singapore:
Singapore Polytechnic will Open Doors to Mature Students Next Year
Thailand:
The National Education Scheme
   
   
   
   

Country: Philippines                          
Title:    Request for Correction of Birth Dates
Author:            Patricia A. ; lSto. Tomas, CSC Chairman.  
Institution:       DECS
Citations:         DECS ORDER No. 59, s. 1990, MEC Order No. 19, s.
                   1990.  
Descriptors:       Personnel data.  
Full text: (Inclosure No. 2 to DECS Order No. 59, s. 1990)

  1.       It is presumed that educators who have reached their
  sixties are responsible people, and that the age which they have
  recorded as theirs, on countless official documents, and which is
  the basis of their social relationships, including their
  relationships with spouses, children, relatives, acquaintances,
  colleges and pepers, et cetera, is their correct age.

  2.       When education officials, therefore, request a change in
  birth date, and especially when such officials do so on the eve of
  mandatory retirement from the service, or especially when the
  applicants tend to come from a single category or rank, there is
  reasonable ground for suspicion of non-service-related
  considerations.  In any event, the long-standing presumption of the
  correctness of the birth date presented or used by the official
  himself or herself for many years must be sustained.  It can be
  overturned only by persuasive and positive evidence of  error.  the
  presumption will not be overcome by allegations of loss of original
  documents, which in itself provers absolutely nothing.

  3.       This Office holds as contrary to the interests of the
  service, in view of the many qualified younger and promotable
  officials, the de facto extension in the service of mandatorily
  retirable personnel, via questionable changes in the birth date
  that make the latter younger than is reflected in official service
  records.

  4.       Henceforth, no requests for change in birth date shall be
  forwarded to this Office, and if forwarded shall not be acted upon,
  on the familiar and unconvncing allegation or contention,
  erroneously presented as evidence, that original documents had been
  lost, destroyed, missing, et cetera.

Copyright © 2003 Seameo Innotech. All rights reserved.