Country: Singapore
Title: Inculcating Core Values in Our Children
Descriptors: Values; Primary school curriculum.
Full text: I made these points in order to put the issue in
perspective. But like everything else in life, there is a price
for success and the price for Singapore is that for educating our
people and our children in English as a key to the techological
knowledge of the West, we also inadvertently expose them to
cultural influences, attitudes and habits of the West. Our people
by being educated in English do not need to read books in
translation as is the case in Japan, Taiwan and Indonesia. They
are able to read published materials directly from the West and see
television programmes directly. And this openness is accentuated
by the development of television as the most pervasive medium of
communication in the world today. Television has made closer the
realization of one world where events that take place in one
country can be instantaneously transmitted with great emotional
impact on citizens in many other countries around the world.
Whether it is soap operas, situation comedies or momentous events
like the funeral of the Emperor in Japan or the destruction of the
space shuttle "Challenger" in America - all these can be
immediately perceived by our children in Singapore. And this daily
dose of television material from the West must, over time, have a
significant impact on our children's attitudes and outlook towards
life. This is why we are today talking about why it is necessary
to retain our core values in a situation where we have emphasized
and encouraged the use of English as a common working language and
exposed our people and our children to the media, particularly
television from the West.
How do we go about inculcating core values in our children? I
think the answer is not with the schools. The answer is with the
home. Inculcation of core values must begin with the home.
Children absorb core values even before they go to school. They
learn them from their parents, grandparents, relatives. When
children are young, they are natural imitators. They see what
adults do, how adults behave in the home and outside the home, and
they follow. If there is an environment of politeness and respect
in the home, these values are absorbed by children, as if by
osmosis. You do not have to teach them consciously. But the
values will remain with the children for a long, long time. So it
must begin in the home, but it can be consolidated in the schools.
Within the school structure, inculcation of core values is best
done during the primary school years. This is because during the
primary school years, from ages 6 to 12, these are the years where
children's impressions and characters are still being formed and
attitudes are being shaped. By the time the child gets to
secondary school, it is unlikely that there will be the same impact
as in primary school when the lessons can be vividly impressed in
his or her mind.
Now, what principles should we follow in the teaching of core
values in schools? From the debate last Friday, it is generally
agreed that the inculcation of core values cannot be effective if
it is confined to a subject that is taught only at specific times
and by specific teachers. As noted by the Member for Moulmein and
the Non-Constituency Member of Parliament, Dr Lee Siew-Choh, it is
the ethos of teachers in the school. It is the example of the
teachers that play the decisive role in the transmission of core
values to pupils in school. A school that is well run and orderly,
where there is an air of politeness, respect and consideration - I
think that that school itself is a better vehicle for the
transmission of core values than any formal lessons that we can
devise.
Last Friday Dr Lee Siew-Choh in his speech made a point that many
of the Chinese stream schools in the old days, particularly the
primary schools, used to teach good traditional values particularly
good manners. I think he has made a valid point.
In fact, in 1979, noting the rapidly declining enrolment in the
Chinese medium primary schools, the Government introduced a
pre-primary programme in order to arrest the declining enrolment in
the Chinese medium schools and to provide the foundation for the
learning of languages. Unfortunately, as I shall explain later,
because of the changes that the pre-primary programme had to
undergo in order to accommodate the large number of schools that
were involved at the start (67 schools or approximately a quarter
of the present number of primary schools), the programme had over
the years to be substantially modified until it is today
effectively a kindergarten programme.
But the original intention was correct. There is much in the
traditional discipline and culture of the former Chinese primary
schools which can be usefully incorporated to inculate desirable
core values in Chinese children. And we should prevent these
Chinese primary school traditions from being totally lost. Many of
the Chinese primary schools have closed down because of declining
enrolment. But fortunately, we still have a number of existing
primary schools which have not lost their Chinese primary school
character, and we should retain these schools as Chinese-type
primary schools but now teaching CL1 in addition to EL1. These
schools will help to keep alive the best traditions of Chinese
primary school education. And if we can succeed in keeping the
number of Chinese primary schools, we can in a way use them as
"seed schools" to see what lessons can be learned in the area of
retention of core values which can later on be transmitted to other
primary schools.
|