|
The
Educational Process
Pre-Primary
Education | Primary
Education | Secondary
Education
The
National Curriculum is developed centrally
and within the Ministry of Education. Three
main departments are responsible for the design
and development of the school curriculum: the
Curriculum Development Centre, responsible
for the design of the school curriculum from
preschool to upper secondary; the Department
of Technical and Vocational Education; and
the Department of Religious and Moral Education.
All
matters regarding policies need to have the
approval of the Central Curriculum Committee,
which consists of the directors of the main
agencies at the Ministry level. For example,
a new subject syllabus needs to be discussed
and approved by this Committee before it can
be implemented. Curricular programmes that
have been approved are then discussed by the
Curriculum Implementation Committee, comprising
the Directors of Education of the fourteen
states of Malaysia and representatives of the
agencies of the Ministry.
The
current process of curriculum development is
based on a cyclical model beginning with a
needs analysis, followed by planning, development,
piloting, dissemination and implementation,
evaluation and then back to the identification
of needs. The time taken between planning and
implementation is usually about thirty months
to allow sufficient time for textbooks to be
ready and distributed and examinations to be
prepared.
For
the 1999 curriculum revision, the strengths
and weaknesses of the curriculum were identified,
as were the issues associated with the content,
skills, values and attitudes, teaching and
learning processes, as well evaluation and
assessment. Through the mapping of these aspects,
adjustments to the curriculum were made whether
the matter in question should be retained,
removed, reduced, added on or re-allotted.
The mapping exercise involved both vertical
and lateral consolidation. An example of a
vertical consolidation is looking at a topic
and examining it across all levels of secondary
schooling. A lateral consolidation would entail
looking at a topic and ensuring the topic is
infused in other subjects where relevant.
The
curricular revisions have resulted in a content-
and outcome-based school curriculum. The content-based
approach lists the topics or themes of the
subject area that students are expected to
acquire, while the outcome-based approach lists
abilities and skills they are expected to master.
Coherence
and integration between and across subject
areas are emphasized as basic features of the
curriculum. Indeed, specific aspects of education
such as moral values, patriotism, science and
technology, language, environmental education,
and study skills are infused across the subject
disciplines, with the purpose of consolidating
these aspects which need further emphasis.
Furthermore, the use of activity-based and
student-centered pedagogical approaches is
encouraged to reinforce and facilitate the
development of critical and creative thinking
skills. These include problem solving, analytical
decision-making, high level questions, inquiry
and discovery, and self-paced and self-directed
learning.
Difficulties
in curriculum development have involved deciding
on the scope of the curriculum, finding people
who have sufficiently specialized skills and
experience in curriculum development, and overcoming
the gap between planning and implementation.
Furthermore, differing school environments
can present a challenge to fulfilling the aspirations
of a centralized curriculum, teachers tend
to resist change, and very often the style
and format of the examination papers and tasks,
rather than curricular objectives, drive the
classroom. Finally, the cascade model of dissemination
has weaknesses, resulting in the dilution of
the message, and thus in misconceptions and
confusion.
Several factors have facilitated the implementation
of curricular reform Initiatives, including research
findings, public opinions, world trends, social
and economic needs and political pressures. Curricular
reform initiatives were further facilitated with
factors such as the government's continued efforts
to expand and improve education and training
by increasing the budget for education, the availability
of basic infrastructure and training, and public
awareness and support to carry out educational
reforms to fulfil the needs of cultural, social,
and economic development.
It
is known that curriculum implementation cannot
be ideally executed as a number of constraints
operate in between. These constraints may include
teachers' qualifications, motivation, attitudes,
skills, content, and clarity in communication;
they might also include pupils' attitudes and
motivation to learn; other obstacles can be
school-related such as class size, management,
facilities, and the school complex. The language
of instruction, and insufficient learning materials
and teaching aids can also present impediments
to curriculum implementation. |